<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowyn.com/2009/09/beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowyn.com/2009/09/beauty/</link>
	<description>Rowyn's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.rowyn.com/2009/09/beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowyn.com/?p=1194#comment-743</guid>
		<description>NATALIE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NATALIE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowyn</title>
		<link>http://www.rowyn.com/2009/09/beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowyn.com/?p=1194#comment-742</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unfamiliar with Rachel McAdams, but that&#039;s a nice photo.  I just did a quickish scan on Google Image Search to find these photos.  A second scan produced a better one, I think, for Catherine Zeta-Jones which I&#039;ve replaced above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unfamiliar with Rachel McAdams, but that&#8217;s a nice photo.  I just did a quickish scan on Google Image Search to find these photos.  A second scan produced a better one, I think, for Catherine Zeta-Jones which I&#8217;ve replaced above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.rowyn.com/2009/09/beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowyn.com/?p=1194#comment-741</guid>
		<description>I think any generic &quot;most beautiful people&quot; list is going to be a little pointless, just because taste is fairly individual, and if it&#039;s getting published in a magazine you have to pick famous people that the readers will know. On the other hand, it&#039;s interesting to see what a &quot;real&quot; person (i.e. someone I know) will choose for their own list. 

It&#039;s also interesting to see the choices of specific photos for these people. I would agree with a lot of your picks, though might have chosen different photos for some. E.g. Catherine Zeta-Jones without hair? What a pity. I do like, however, how some of them have such natural-looking smiles, rather than looking too posed (even if they are). E.g. Ziyi Zhang, and Rachel Weisz. Smiles are important. :-)

You say Scarlett Johannsen is &quot;too distinctive,&quot; though personally I&#039;d give that extra points. SJ herself doesn&#039;t particularly do it for me, but in general, it&#039;s a plus to look beautiful in your own way, rather than in the usual way pop culture expects.

I&#039;m tempted to make my own list (later on, when I&#039;m not procrastinating on my packing), but for now I&#039;ll just second the votes for Catherine Zeta-Jones and Aishwarya Rai (though with different pictures), and I&#039;ll add in &lt;a href=&quot;http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/rachel-mcadams/rachel-mcadams-20060407-120469.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rachel McAdams&lt;/a&gt;, who I liked in &lt;em&gt;The Time-Traveler&#039;s Wife&lt;/em&gt; (though she looks a bit spaced-out in that particular picture).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think any generic &#8220;most beautiful people&#8221; list is going to be a little pointless, just because taste is fairly individual, and if it&#8217;s getting published in a magazine you have to pick famous people that the readers will know. On the other hand, it&#8217;s interesting to see what a &#8220;real&#8221; person (i.e. someone I know) will choose for their own list. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to see the choices of specific photos for these people. I would agree with a lot of your picks, though might have chosen different photos for some. E.g. Catherine Zeta-Jones without hair? What a pity. I do like, however, how some of them have such natural-looking smiles, rather than looking too posed (even if they are). E.g. Ziyi Zhang, and Rachel Weisz. Smiles are important. :-)</p>
<p>You say Scarlett Johannsen is &#8220;too distinctive,&#8221; though personally I&#8217;d give that extra points. SJ herself doesn&#8217;t particularly do it for me, but in general, it&#8217;s a plus to look beautiful in your own way, rather than in the usual way pop culture expects.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to make my own list (later on, when I&#8217;m not procrastinating on my packing), but for now I&#8217;ll just second the votes for Catherine Zeta-Jones and Aishwarya Rai (though with different pictures), and I&#8217;ll add in <a href="http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/rachel-mcadams/rachel-mcadams-20060407-120469.jpg" rel="nofollow">Rachel McAdams</a>, who I liked in <em>The Time-Traveler&#8217;s Wife</em> (though she looks a bit spaced-out in that particular picture).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
